(Reply).
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
sheldrake.livejournal.com at 04:29pm on 10/12/2003| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9 |
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
it's not romance, it's affection. what they clearly have for each other. and maybe there are other undercurrents but it doesn't even matter because they love each other so purely, without need for undercurrents. without all the false starts and stops, all the doubts, of romance.
You're sounding a bit like PJ there, you know... :) But I absolutely agree, yes, and you put it so beautifully, which is why I just quoted it back to you.
Also, may I say how nice it is to see you back and writing again, which I would have said in feedback if I was anything like together at the moment, but anyway. Yes. :)