I haven't been posting much lately. Normally I would start off with lots of excuses and apologies for my appalling behaviour, but I'm trying to cut down on that sort of thing.
Nothing to report about the job stuff at present. Nothing much to report about anything, really.
I've said it before, but I need to stop wasting vast swathes of time reading the comments posted to blogs and online news articles. It's like I'm deliberately poisoning myself with other people's stupidity. There are lots of other things I could be doing: knitting, practising the piano, writing... hoovering.
That said, I have been somewhat preoccupied of late by the Carol Thatcher affair. Honestly, I don't even how to begin talking about it. Maybe the idea that somebody who has a high-profile job in the UK media in 2009, and whose parent ran the country for over a decade, could somehow have missed the fact that it's offensive to go around calling black people 'golliwogs'. How is that even possible? Or the fact that, having discovered this fact, that person would not simply apologise and move on. Maybe the fact that I'm really tired of hearing people say, "Oh, but in her day, these things were acceptable. It was just a lovely toy." Here's the thing. I'm 34. I had one of those lovely toys as a child (a present from an elderly relative, I think) and I seem to remember I was quite fond of it. I saw the logo on the jamjar at breakfast every morning. I didn't think these things were racist at the time (I didn't think about them much at all), but that doesn't mean they weren't. I was a child. I was also a child in a culturally diverse, working class area of North London. Racism was there, in the street and in the playground, and it was vicious. It surrounded all of us, and yet for me it could be something in the background, something always off to one side. It buzzed in my ear, but I was able to wave it away like an annoying fly. Because I was white, and that meant I never really had to see it. I could go to school and play with my friends, few of whom were white, and come home and play with Golly (who, incidentally, was not allowed out of the house. I don't think I ever questioned why. I'd actually forgotten that until now). I was not forced to make connections.
Eventally I grew up.
There was some Tory nitwit on the radio bemoaning the loss of these delightful toys and that lovely whimsical word, to the 'PC Brigade'. When Carol and I were children, he said, nobody thought there was anything wrong with them. Nobody. Right. Carol Thatcher is what, mid-50s? If you're that age, there has been a sizeable black population living in this country for your whole life. But when you say 'us', you mean white people. Say what you mean.
These things we cling to are not valuable. They are racist caricatures of racist caricatures, and they hurt people. There is nothing not racist about them. The lengths some people are now going to to prove that their beloved toys are nothing whatsoever to do with black people, and never were, that they somehow exist in a vacuum, are incredible to me. You can't make things nice and unproblematic just by wanting it. Honestly, people. Let go of this stuff now. Is it really that important to you? It's degrading and embarrassing. Grow up.
Ok, just had to get that off my chest. I'm definitely going to do my ironing now.
Nothing to report about the job stuff at present. Nothing much to report about anything, really.
I've said it before, but I need to stop wasting vast swathes of time reading the comments posted to blogs and online news articles. It's like I'm deliberately poisoning myself with other people's stupidity. There are lots of other things I could be doing: knitting, practising the piano, writing... hoovering.
That said, I have been somewhat preoccupied of late by the Carol Thatcher affair. Honestly, I don't even how to begin talking about it. Maybe the idea that somebody who has a high-profile job in the UK media in 2009, and whose parent ran the country for over a decade, could somehow have missed the fact that it's offensive to go around calling black people 'golliwogs'. How is that even possible? Or the fact that, having discovered this fact, that person would not simply apologise and move on. Maybe the fact that I'm really tired of hearing people say, "Oh, but in her day, these things were acceptable. It was just a lovely toy." Here's the thing. I'm 34. I had one of those lovely toys as a child (a present from an elderly relative, I think) and I seem to remember I was quite fond of it. I saw the logo on the jamjar at breakfast every morning. I didn't think these things were racist at the time (I didn't think about them much at all), but that doesn't mean they weren't. I was a child. I was also a child in a culturally diverse, working class area of North London. Racism was there, in the street and in the playground, and it was vicious. It surrounded all of us, and yet for me it could be something in the background, something always off to one side. It buzzed in my ear, but I was able to wave it away like an annoying fly. Because I was white, and that meant I never really had to see it. I could go to school and play with my friends, few of whom were white, and come home and play with Golly (who, incidentally, was not allowed out of the house. I don't think I ever questioned why. I'd actually forgotten that until now). I was not forced to make connections.
Eventally I grew up.
There was some Tory nitwit on the radio bemoaning the loss of these delightful toys and that lovely whimsical word, to the 'PC Brigade'. When Carol and I were children, he said, nobody thought there was anything wrong with them. Nobody. Right. Carol Thatcher is what, mid-50s? If you're that age, there has been a sizeable black population living in this country for your whole life. But when you say 'us', you mean white people. Say what you mean.
These things we cling to are not valuable. They are racist caricatures of racist caricatures, and they hurt people. There is nothing not racist about them. The lengths some people are now going to to prove that their beloved toys are nothing whatsoever to do with black people, and never were, that they somehow exist in a vacuum, are incredible to me. You can't make things nice and unproblematic just by wanting it. Honestly, people. Let go of this stuff now. Is it really that important to you? It's degrading and embarrassing. Grow up.
Ok, just had to get that off my chest. I'm definitely going to do my ironing now.
(no subject)
Australia is so casually racist in our language and behaviour - largely, I think, because we still percieve ourselves as largely anglo. These issues will start to surface here soon, IMO.
(no subject)
Yeah, it's amazing the crap that floats to the surface when stuff gets a bit stirred up, isn't it? Disturbing.
(no subject)
Every so often, even though I know better, I will read the comments on imdb.com. Deliberately poisoning is a very apt description! It's like I don't believe just how stupid people can be and have to make sure again and again...
(no subject)
(no subject)
Sigh.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Either way, your thoughts act for me as entirely apt last words on the topic. Nail on head.
And, I do hope the spiders have gone away. ;)
(no subject)
I love how people are now saying, "Why is poor Carol victimised, when nasty Ross gets to keep his job?"
Oh, I have so many answers to this. Bear with me.
JR was trying to be funny, it went wrong, people were hurt by it. He was called on it, he said he was sorry, he was punished and then allowed to go back to work.
CT was trying to be funny, it went wrong, people were hurt by it. She was called on it, she told them she was sorry they couldn't take a joke, she was sacked from the show. She then demanded that people apologise to her.
This is leaving aside the fact that these are two HUGELY different issues. It's one thing to upset someone by being rude to them, it's another to casually use racist language when you're doing it.
I think the BBC's actions were entirely appropriate here. Had she just said, "Oh my god, I'm so sorry, I didn't realise," things might have been different. She dug this hole for herself.
(no subject)
As far as I can make out, CT made her comment to about 12 people in an "off duty" area. Maybe someone should have just said to her face at the time that what she'd said was racist and unacceptable and that it offended them. I don't think CT would ever say she is sorry when publicly backed into a corner. She is, after all, her mother's daughter. But she probably would have if someone actually there had pulled her on it. I'm somewhat surprised someone like Jo Brand didn't actually...
The BBC should have still sacked her (no loss as far as I am concerned!) but instead they ensured that her racist comment was effectively broadcast to the world, including the person mentioned. Who must surely feel hurt.
(no subject)
It seems a bit unclear what actually happened in that green room. Some people are saying Jo Brand did call her on it (I agree, it's what I'd have done, I hope), others that nobody did. But in my opinion, the workplace is a public space. If you say things where people can hear them, you have to be prepared to take the consequences. These people weren't her friends, she wasn't at home. It's not surprising that someone might have left that room and said to someone else, "You'll never guess what that Carol Thatcher said!" Things have a habit of getting out.
And while I'd like to give her the benefit of the doubt and say that she'd have apologised if someone had called her on it, I really don't believe she would have done. I think her reaction would have been exactly the same. The reason I think this is because I've been in this situation at work, I was person who pointed it out (I did it quite nicely, I'm not great at being confrontational!), and that was the exact reaction I got. "It was just a joke, I'm not a racist, I haven't done anything wrong". No apology. And unfortunately I've seen that same thing happen over and over again.
As I say, it's hard to be really clear on what exactly happened and why (and yeah, it's hardly news that Carol Thatcher's a bit of an idiot), but (given that it did get out) what really bothers me is all the people who've now crawled out of the woodwork and revealed themselves to be just as insensitive and racist and idiotic. Just makes me sad, that's all. :(
(no subject)
In a broadcast or "off duty", it's the word. And it's also the nature of it, its intent and what surrounds it that's the issue.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I spend a lot of time on the Guardian website and I have two rules - never read CiF and never respond to CiF. Same goes for the BBC HYS. I am not always good at keeping these rules, mind.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Noooo don't read comments willy nilly! Most disheartening.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I now can't think of what to say about that. It seems you've said it all.
You know, until your rant just now I, also, shrugged off this thing as storm in a pc teacup. Somehow I hadn't realised that it was Carol Thatcher who was saying this. And my mind was changed! Does that mean that in my brain it's okay for a random person to say gollywog but not for the Iron Lady's daughter?
It's all interesting, and somewhat unsettliing, to think about.
(no subject)
It's easy to see it as yet another case of OutrageOMG!, there have been so many lately, especially concerning the BBC, but I do think this one was different. Perhaps it's to do with growing up with the word and all its confusing connotations -- I have an instinctive reaction of 'wtf?'. I felt the same about the recent Prince Harry thing. They're words I grew up hearing in the playground and they sting when I hear them, even though they weren't directed at me. It's difficult for me to understand the wail of 'Leave poor Harry/Carol alone!'
Of course, the Thatcher element adds something... I hear the BBC are now being accused of a deliberate campaign against the family, after a couple of mild jokes on QI the other night (a programme recorded in July).
Possible I need to take a holiday from news. Oh wait. I work for a newspaper.
(no subject)
Do you know, I can't even now remember what exactly Harry said. The news succeed each other so fast, it's all a blur. All I recall is that his dad called some fellow polo-playing toff 'Sootie' and that was taken to be a slur on the chap's dusky skin colour, except Sootie is yellow and the chap wasn't Chinese.
Also, I must confess, I care little for what toffs call each other because they're all toffs together and privilege oozes out of their ears.
(no subject)
Harry was filming his army pals, and he said "And this is our little Paki friend."
except Sootie is yellow and the chap wasn't Chinese.
Perhaps he was a magician?
privilege oozes out of their ears.
This is very true. Although I wish they'd ooze in the privacy of their own homes and not all over me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Yes! I think I said these exact words to Stupid Racist Work Colleague, but she never actually got it.
I was thinkng about this the other night, and why it always comes up. I think it's because in some people's minds, jokes are by default friendly and benign. As long as we're laughing (as long as somebody's laughing) everything's fine. If you're not laughing, it's your problem.
I wonder if the 'just a joke' brigade are the sort of people who didn't get picked on at school?
(no subject)
(no subject)